I Don’t Use The Word “Neocon”

cached/copied 07-02-2016
for original link, click here -- http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-01/hacked-emails-confirm-nato-push-provoke-escalate-conflict-russia#comment-7767243

I Don’t Use The Word “Neocon”

Zero Hedge Commentary

Librarian

Jul 2, 2016 10:10 AM

I think now we can go back and figure out what happened here with the benefit of hindsight.

I don’t use the word “neocon”.  In my view, the globalist financial scheme to force the US into a war goes far beyond the simple Red vs. Blue distinctions used in the past.  These former labels have since converged for the globalist goal in which the US has been picked to do the globalist’s dirty work.  Perhaps there is such a thing as a “neoliberal”, but I think that the confusion caused by these old labels only serves the purposes of those who are pushing the globalist narrative of Russia as the aggressor by confusing the issues.

McCain, Breedlove, HRC, Nuland and several others of their globalist ilk have been doing their damndest to provoke any sort of conflict with Russia so that the US will eventually stumble into an actual war.  The reasons for this are not so complex.  Any 6th grade mathematics teacher can understand the numbers behind this.  After the US congress decided to pay back the Too Big to Fail investment bankers in 2008 by first bailing them out following their reckless investment gambles and then to assume the debt of nongovernmental organizations Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae on the backs of the US taxpayers – it became clear that these financial parasites had more or less killed their host.  There was simply no more easy money to be had.  The globalists finally discovered the equivalent of discovering one’s own ass with the assistance of both hands, a map and a flashlight – that it's not going to be possible to have any economic growth in the US going forward with a 20t debt. 

So, what does a greedy fucker globalist do in this particular situation?  War.  A war of about two years with an average war economy monthly rate of inflation of 2-3 percent inflation per month inflates away this 20t debt in the two year time period that the US would fight such a war.  Run the numbers yourself and you can verify that after two years of an average war with average monthly inflationary that the debt is down to almost 6t.  Of course, there is the matter of millions of dead, but for the globalists these civilian deaths are similar to the downsizing of a corporation.  For all functional purposes, a war with Russia or China would erase the current US debt.  As a bonus it would also allow the globalists to squelch all the annoying logical talk against such a war.  Hey, it’s not a great plan.  But it does allow those in power to remain in power. 

I was trying to figure out why Breedlove was retired so suddenly.  My best educated guess is as follows.  Breedlove was probably implicated in the scandal involving the fake pictures supplied to Senator Inhofe's office. 

The article touches on it briefly, but here’s a quick summary of that scandal.  Back in February of 2015, the globalists were “full steam ahead” scheming to get the US into a war.  Adjunct Professor (meaning that he is not a full-time professor anywhere, aka – he was never good enough to be considered for tenure at any real university) Karber has made his bank for the past decade serving up one-sided propaganda pieces to the globalist war hawks.

Senator Inhofe was a sponsor of a bill to supply lethal aid to Ukraine to use against the Russians.  Everything was going swimmingly and it appeared that the bill would pass and that guns would be (legally) supplied to Ukraine.  US-supplied weapons are still making their way to Ukraine in spite of no officially sanctioned US-supplied lethal aid to Ukraine, but that is another story.

Part-time Professor Karber was brought on board with his shady NGO “the Potomac Foundation” to “assist” the Ukrainian delegation that came to the US to present evidence in favor of US lethal aid to Ukraine.  Their premise was simple – Russia had already invaded Ukraine and they had the photos to prove it.  A Buzzfeed reporter quickly discovered that the photos relied on by the Ukrainian delegation were bogus.  They instead were from other conflicts in the past and none were taken in Ukraine that showed any Russian military presence.

The Ukrainian delegation went home empty handed.

Once they were back in Ukraine, the members of this delegation began to lick their wounds and to compare notes.  They figured out that it was Karber that had fucked them over by supplying the fake pictures to Senator Inhofe.  Karber for his part only would say that “it was an unfortunate misunderstanding”.

http://inosmi.ru/sngbaltia/20150213/226262226.html?id=226262589

http://www.ua-reporter.com/novosti/164763

http://nvdaily.ru/info/41521.html

I’m guessing that Breedlove was somehow caught up in this fake photo scandal.  As far as I know it’s still a crime to provide false or misleading testimony to a congressional committee, notwithstanding the James Clapper false testimony exception.  This would explain Breedlove’s sudden reassignment. 

I would be interested to know if the Potomac Foundation is financed by the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) or by Soros.  I am not a journalist.  I only have access to the limited resources of a retired volunteer librarian. Perhaps someone else can take on this bit of research.  One of the members of the Ukrainian delegation to the US Congress was Anatoly Pinchuk.  Anatoly Pinchuk is the brother of Victor Pinchuk who is to date the largest foreign contributor to the Clinton Global Initiative.  Why he would be involved in this delegation is something of a mystery.  He was not involved in the Ukrainian government at the time.  Also he didn’t appear to have any particular interest in whether Ukraine received lethal aid or not.  His only accomplishment appears to be that he is the brother of someone who funneled millions of dollars to the Clintons.  Ukraine has been a country on the very edge of financial collapse for over a decade.  What is the source of the Pinchuk millions that was given to the Clintons?  Is it even possible that the US government is the indirect source of this money – was the Pinchuk donation originally aid money from the IMF and the US to Ukraine which was stolen by the Pinchuks and then sent to the Clintons?  Wouldn’t that just take the cake…

Finally, I’ll share a few caveats about online translators.  None of them are perfect.  You should use more than one online translator when reading news stories in different languages.  I use translate.yandex.ru and translate.google.com as my primary online translators.